The French Revolution

By 1756, France was considered to be one of the greatest countries on Earth. They had grand monuments, incredible military campaigns and a fantastic life. However, underneath the surface lurked a social hierarchy that threatened the stability of the nation. The nobility and the clergy were very well known for partying like there was no tomorrow, whilst the poor suffered and starved, hardly ever making enough money to buy a loaf of bread.

Meanwhile, the New World was being conquered and Britain and France were arguing over a strip of land that both of them claimed to own. Thus erupted the Seven Years War, and France lost hard. Due to the war reparations, France was in severe financial ruin. Despite this, the nobility continued to party, neglecting the people who had work their backs off to make the nobility’s life good. This was when France’s poor began to question the social hierarchy, beginning the Age of Enlightenment.

Great philosophical thinkers across the country began questioning if the greatest country on Earth was really all it was cracked up to be. During this time, Louis XVI was crowned the new King of France. Louis was notoriously weak, hardly competent enough to run a country, never mind one in severe financial debt that was questioning the establishment of the monarchy.

A painting of King Louis XVI

One of the first acts he did was to get revenge on the British by helping fund the American Revolution. Once the war was over with, America didn’t pay France back, meaning that France was now in even more debt than before. The poor envied the elite even more, because they were suffering with the effects of this financial ruin, whilst the nobility still acted like there was no problem. Most of their hate was targeted at Louis’ wife, former Archduchess of Austria, Marie Antoinette. Her high spending on her increasingly lavish lifestyle, fashion and beauty earned her the nickname “Madame Deficit”

A painting of Marie Antoinette

People began ridiculing the royals, over a scandal that Louis apparently took a very long time to consummate the marriage. Graphic artwork was drawn, depicting Antoinette as a whore and the King as a weakling who wouldn’t put out. As support for the monarchy was at an all time low, the King and his advisors decided that now would be a good time to tax the poor, for basically anything you can think of, with an especially ridiculous one being on salt. Some of these were collected by private companies, who walked around with armed thugs. Resistance against these taxes often ended in violence. Meanwhile, the clergy and nobility either had to pay little or no tax at all, which angered the peasants even more. France was now on the brink of revolution, and the push they needed was a bad harvest.

A series of harsh summers and winters came and went, killing the harvest for those years. They now had no food or money, whilst the cost of bread drastically went up. Naturally, the nobility had stocks of grain and wheat so, yet again, believed nothing was wrong. This was the final push that the poor needed to riot. Bakeries were raided for their bread, whilst some bakers who were suspected of hoarding were hanged in the streets.

The revolutionaries spread propaganda saying that Marie Antoinette had been informed that the rioters were starving and responded saying “Then let them eat cake” in an effort to make her seem out of touch. In actuality, Antoinette never said this. When dealing with a crisis, Louis did what he always did was run off, and get someone else to do the work for him. Specifically, he turned to the Estates General, which was an advisory body that was rarely ever summoned, where representatives from each of the three estates, that being the clergy, the nobility and everyone else, would gather to decide important issues.

A drawing of the Estates General of 1789

Louis decided that to come to any form of conclusion, he had to set up a voting system. However, each class only got one vote. Despite making up 98% of the population, the 3rd estate would often find their proposals, which often helped the poor which would destabilise the rich, outvoted by the clergy and the nobility. They instead decided to set up their own government, the National Assembly, where the third estate controlled. Louis attempted to stop the National Assembly by locking them out of their building but they very quickly found a solution by finding a different building that wasn’t locked, that being a tennis court down the street, where they all swore the Tennis Court Oath, where they pledged to continue to meet until the King gave into their demands for economic reform.

A drawing of the Tennis Court Oath

The National Assembly included many great thinkers. Two important ones we’ll mention were Maximilien Robespierre and Georges Danton. Other members of the first two estates joined, most importantly Marquis de Lafayette, a former military officer from the American Revolution. Some of these great thinkers, including Robespierre and Danton formed a political party called the Jacobin Club. Some radicals within the party did not just campaign for economic reform but the removal of the monarchy.

Fearing his stability, Louis ordered the army to convene around Paris. Hearing of this, the third estate feared that the King was going to arrest and execute them. During this, the King dismissed popular financial advisor Jacques Neckler, who had been trying to fix the economy on his own. The people of France, who had suffered, starved and been treated like gum on a shoe had enough and decided that they had to act now. They began to revolt.

Believing that the French Military would attack, the National Assembly formed the Bourgeois Militia or National Guard. Many French soldiers began to defect. On July 14th, 1789, the revolutionaries began storming the Hôtel les Invalides, a military hospital where they secured a large number of guns. However, these guns had no ammunition. Luckily, the Bastille was only 3 miles away, a large military fort. They demanded that Governor de Launay hand the fort and gunpowder over. De Launay refused and the revolutionaries violently stormed the Bastille, killing the French troops, cutting off De Launay’s head and parading it around Paris on a pike.

A painting of the Storming of the Bastille

The National Assembly fully endorsed the act. Many historians state that the endorsement of the Storming of the Bastille paved the way for the extreme violence that followed, which the French Revolution is known for. A lot of this violence was encouraged by Jean-Paul Marat, a violent radical with a skin condition that confined him to his bath tub. He wrote a newspaper called “The Friend of the People” in which he wrote ramblings about killing the nobility.

[The Friend of the People began] with a severe but honest tone, that of a man who wishes to tell the truth without breaking the conventions of society. I maintained that tone for two whole months. Disappointed in finding that it did not produce the entire effect that I had expected, and indignant that the boldness of the unfaithful representatives of the people and of the lying public officials was steadily increasing, I felt that it was necessary to renounce moderation[…]. Strongly convinced of the absolute perversity of the supporters of the old regime and the enemies of liberty, I felt that nothing could be obtained from them except by force. Revolted by their attempts, by their ever-recurrent plots, I realized that no end would be put to these except by exterminating the ones guilty of them.

Marat’s writing in The Friend of the People

It quickly became one of the popular publications in Paris at the time. By August, the National Assembly, with the help of Thomas Jefferson, had written up “The Declaration of the Rights of the Man and of the Citizen” declaring equal rights for all men. Despite shortcomings in gender rights, it was considered a great document. However, the French People were still starving, and believed that the reason was because Louis didn’t see the problem himself, as he lived in Versailles, not Paris where most of the revolution and economic problems were occurring. The women of Paris decided to do something about it.

They marched on Versailles, gathering support along the way until a crowd in the tens of thousands had arrived at the Palace of Versailles, demanding to see the King. The rioters broke into the palace, intending to kill Antoinette, who had escaped through a secret passage. The rioters killed the royal guard, cut off their heads and stuck them on pikes.

A painting of the Women’s March on Versailles

The King eventually came out to the crowd, saying that he would accept working along side the revolutionary government. He moved pack to Paris with the revolutionaries along side the rest of his family. Once he moved, the government, piece by piece, began stripping his power. Fearing for his life, he had to become more friendly with the revolutionaries, even at one point wearing the revolutionary beret. Louis knew he had to get out of the country and fast. He hoped to seek sanctuary in Austria due to his wife’s ties to the Austrian Royal Family. However, they were stopped at Varennes, after postmaster Jean-Baptiste Drouet recognised him due to the stamp with his face on it on his assignat and was arrested.

An assignat with Louis’ face at the top

The façade of revolutionary support that Louis had been putting up suddenly crumbled in the blink of an eye. Many considered him a traitor who attempted to abandon his people. The New Constitution of 1791 made Louis nothing more than a figurehead for the country. Jacobin radicals were still furious that the King hadn’t been removed outright. They organised a large protest, at which the National Guard shot at the revolutionaries. This revealed the division between the two factions of the revolution, the moderates who wanted to keep the King as a figurehead and the radicals who wanted the King deposed and killed.

Whilst nobility were leaving the country, other European superpowers with monarchies feared that France’s revolutionary ideas might spread. Fearing an attack, the newly renamed Legislative Assembly declared war on Austria, beginning the War of the First Coalition. With an alliance being made with the Prussians, France hardly stood a chance. Charles William Ferdinand, Duke of Brunswick sent a letter to the revolutionaries, warning that if any harm were to come to Louis, he would burn Paris to the ground. In a surprising turn of events, this invigorated the French people to do the exact opposite, as they were angered by the threat. The riots escalated and the Palace was eventually stormed, where fighting broke out between the revolutionaries and the King’s Guard. The King ran to the Legislative Assembly, where a vote was held. The monarchy was suspended almost unanimously. Louis, no longer King of France was put in prison along side Antoinette.

On September 22nd, 1792, the Legislative Assembly, now called the National Convention declared the French Republic, where ideas of democracy and equality were thrown around. But those ideas were drowned by their thirst for blood. In order to remove any artifact of their monarchist past, they began by deporting or arresting members of the clergy and replacing Catholicism with the state sponsored, Atheist religion called the Cult of Reason. Churches and cathedrals such as Notre Dame had their Catholic relics taken or destroyed and the buildings were turned into “Temples of Reason”. The Christian Calendar was gotten rid of, replacing it with the French Republican Calendar. The lengths of minutes, hours and days were changed with an entirely new set of months. The nobility were also arrested on mass along side the clergy.

Meanwhile the Austrian lines were advancing, and thousands of men were sent away from Paris to the frontlines. This was when paranoia began to set in. People began to believe that the clergy and nobility, all clustered together in prisons, were plotting their revenge, ideas that were pushed further by Marat. Fearing an uprising, revolutionaries broke into the prisons and killed everyone. The priests, the aristocrats and even the women and children. 1,600 people were tried and executed on the spot. A journalist for the London times wondered:

Are these “the Rights of Man”? Is this the liberty of Human Nature?

The London Times, Sept 10, 1792

Meanwhile, on the front lines, Prussia and Austria told France that if they won the war, they would reinstate Louis to the throne. In response to this, a trial was held for Louis for the crime of treason. While some recommended deportation, Robespierre insisted that Louis would be executed. The execution choice won out by only 1 vote. He was to be execute using the newly invented guillotine.

On the morning of January 21st 1793, Louis was woken at 5 in the morning. He ordered his royal seal be given to his son and his wedding ring to his wife. He was transported to the Place de la Revolution. He walked up the gallows, with snare drums rolling as he went up. He requested that the drummers stop so he could deliver some final words.

Frenchmen, I die guiltless of the crime imputed to me. I forgive the authors of my death and pray God my blood fall not on France.

Louis’ last words to the people of France

The snare drums started up again, drowning out his true final words. His hair was cut and his collar was opened. His neck laid on the block and the blade came down, slicing his head clean off. The cannons fired, signifying that he was dead.

Louis’ head being displayed to the crowd

Background to the French Revolution

By the middle of the eighteenth century, France was one of the most powerful countries in the world. The Kingdom possessed a huge population, a powerful army and navy, a vast colonial empire and one of Europe’s most influential cultures. Paris was a centre of intellectual and artistic life, while the royal court at Versailles represented the extraordinary wealth and power of the French monarchy. But beneath this grandeur was a society divided by enormous inequalities. French society was organised according to a system known as the Ancien Régime. The population was formally divided into three estates. The First Estate consisted of the Catholic clergy, the Second Estate consisted of the nobility, and virtually everyone else belonged to the Third Estate.

A political cartoon depicting the Three Estates

The divisions were not merely social. The first two estates possessed significant privileges that were denied to the overwhelming majority of the population. Members of the clergy and nobility were often exempt from some of the taxes imposed upon ordinary people, while many nobles enjoyed feudal rights over the peasants who worked their land. The Third Estate, meanwhile, contained everyone from wealthy merchants and lawyers to urban workers and impoverished peasants. Although these groups had vastly different lives, they shared one important characteristic: they lacked the legal privileges enjoyed by the first two estates. This created an increasingly uncomfortable contradiction. France was becoming wealthier and more commercially sophisticated, yet political power remained concentrated among a relatively small section of society.

France’s problems were made considerably worse by its rivalry with Britain. Both countries were competing for territory, trade and influence across Europe, North America, the Caribbean and India. Tensions eventually erupted into the Seven Years’ War in 1756, one of the first conflicts to become genuinely global in scale. France initially appeared capable of challenging Britain, but the war ended disastrously for the French. Britain captured important French possessions in North America and India, while the Treaty of Paris in 1763 forced France to surrender much of its colonial territory.

A painting of Frederick II and his army during the Seven Years War

The defeat was more than a military humiliation. France had spent enormous sums fighting the war and was left with a massive national debt. The monarchy now faced a problem that would haunt it for decades: it needed more money, but the people with the greatest wealth and political influence were often the very people most resistant to taxation.

At the same time, an intellectual revolution was taking place across Europe. The Enlightenment was a broad movement of philosophers, writers and political thinkers who questioned traditional assumptions about government, religion and society. Thinkers such as Voltaire, Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Montesquieu argued, in different ways, that political authority should be subjected to reason and that individuals possessed rights that governments were expected to respect.

A painting of a group of Enlightenment thinkers reading a classical tragedy

Montesquieu promoted the idea of separating political power between different branches of government. Rousseau argued that legitimate political authority ultimately came from the people, rather than simply from hereditary rulers. Voltaire attacked religious intolerance and abuses of authority. These ideas did not automatically call for the destruction of monarchy. Many Enlightenment thinkers initially supported the idea of reforming existing governments rather than overthrowing them.

Nevertheless, their arguments provided Europeans with a new way of thinking about political authority. If government existed to serve society, why should a king possess almost unlimited political authority simply because he had been born into the royal family? And if all people possessed natural rights, why should some be granted legal privileges simply because of their birth? These questions would become increasingly dangerous for the French monarchy.

A painting of the French Royal Family

In 1774, Louis XVI became King of France following the death of his grandfather, Louis XV. Louis inherited a country with enormous potential but equally enormous problems. He was not the caricature of an entirely incompetent ruler sometimes portrayed by later revolutionary propaganda. He could be conscientious and genuinely wanted to improve France. However, he was indecisive, politically inexperienced and frequently struggled to make difficult decisions. More importantly, he inherited a financial system that was deeply resistant to reform. France’s debt had continued to grow since the Seven Years’ War. The monarchy had also spent enormous sums supporting the American colonists during the American Revolutionary War, hoping to weaken Britain and recover some of the prestige France had lost during the Seven Years’ War.

The strategy worked militarily. France helped the Americans defeat Britain and played a crucial role in the victory at Yorktown in 1781. Financially, however, it was disastrous. The French government had effectively spent enormous amounts of money helping another country win independence while already struggling to pay its own debts. Successive ministers attempted to solve the problem by reforming taxation and reducing government expenditure. However, these reforms repeatedly encountered resistance from powerful groups who feared losing their privileges. Finance ministers such as Anne Robert Jacques Turgot, Jacques Necker and Charles Alexandre de Calonne proposed different solutions, but none could permanently resolve the crisis. The problem was not simply that France lacked money. It was that the monarchy struggled to reform the system through which money was collected.

Jacques Necker, a finance minister from the period

France possessed a complicated collection of taxes, exemptions and privileges that made taxation deeply unequal. Attempts to make the wealthy contribute more were often blocked by institutions dominated by privileged elites. The monarchy therefore found itself trapped. It needed to reform the system to survive, but reform required the cooperation of people who benefited from the existing system. By the late 1780s, the situation had become critical. Poor harvests caused the price of bread to rise dramatically, placing enormous pressure on ordinary families. For peasants and urban workers, bread was not merely another expense: it was a necessity of life. A sudden increase in its price could mean hunger.

At the same time, unemployment and poverty were increasing in many parts of the country. Meanwhile, France’s political elite continued to debate how the kingdom should be governed. The contrast was becoming impossible to ignore. At Versailles, the monarchy remained surrounded by the ceremony and splendour of the royal court. Outside the palace, ordinary French people increasingly questioned why they were expected to bear the financial burden of a system that appeared to benefit the privileged. The monarchy’s financial crisis was therefore becoming a political crisis.

A painting of Versailles in the 1770s

By 1788, the French government was effectively approaching bankruptcy. Louis XVI’s ministers could no longer solve the problem through ordinary financial measures. France had helped create a new republic partly to weaken Britain, but the financial consequences of that decision would help undermine the French monarchy itself. As the financial crisis worsened, resentment towards the royal family intensified. Much of this anger became concentrated on Louis XVI’s wife, Marie Antoinette, the daughter of Empress Maria Theresa of Austria. She had arrived in France as a teenager after marrying the future king in 1770, symbolising the diplomatic alliance between France and Austria.

Marie Antoinette became an extraordinarily unpopular figure. Her expensive clothing, jewellery, entertainments and lavish lifestyle made her an easy target at a time when ordinary French people were struggling to afford basic necessities. She became associated with the extravagance of Versailles, even though many of the most extreme stories about her spending were exaggerated or completely fabricated. Her reputation was so poor that political pamphlets began referring to her as “Madame Déficit.” The nickname was unfair in the sense that Marie Antoinette was not responsible for France’s enormous national debt. The financial crisis had existed long before her influence became significant. Nevertheless, her lifestyle provided revolutionaries with a convenient symbol of everything they believed was wrong with the Ancien Régime. She was no longer simply the King’s wife. To many of his opponents, she represented the entire privileged elite.

A portrait of Marie Antoinette

The royal family’s reputation was made even worse by a series of scandals and rumours. Louis XVI’s marriage to Marie Antoinette had initially attracted enormous public attention. The couple’s failure to consummate their marriage for several years became the subject of widespread gossip. Louis eventually underwent a medical procedure that appears to have resolved the problem, and the couple eventually had four children.

However, by then the damage had been done. Pamphlets and political cartoons portrayed the King as weak and sexually incompetent while depicting Marie Antoinette as promiscuous and morally corrupt. Much of this material was deliberately designed to humiliate the royal couple rather than accurately describe their private lives.

A cartoon depicting the sexual frustrations of Louis XVI

The most notorious scandal was the Diamond Necklace Affair of 1785. Marie Antoinette had nothing to do with the scheme, but con artists managed to convince a cardinal that he was secretly purchasing an extraordinarily expensive diamond necklace on the Queen’s behalf. When the fraud was exposed, the Queen’s reputation suffered even further. The episode demonstrated how effectively political propaganda could be used against the monarchy. By the late 1780s, rumours about the royal family were no longer merely gossip. They had become political weapons.

While the monarchy struggled to pay its debts, the burden of taxation fell disproportionately upon the Third Estate. France’s taxation system was extremely complicated. Some taxes were imposed directly by the monarchy, while others were collected locally or through privileged arrangements. One of the most hated was the gabelle, a tax on salt that had existed for centuries and varied dramatically between different regions. Tax collection could also be deeply unpopular because some taxes were collected through private contractors known as fermiers généraux. These financiers effectively purchased the right to collect certain taxes on behalf of the Crown and could employ armed guards to enforce payment. For peasants and urban workers, taxation was therefore not simply an abstract financial issue. It could mean losing money they desperately needed to buy food.

A cartoon depicting the tax collecters

The resentment was made worse by the perception that the wealthy were protected from the worst consequences. The clergy and nobility possessed important tax privileges, while the Third Estate carried much of the financial burden. This created an increasingly explosive political question: why should the people who had the least wealth be expected to carry so much of the country’s financial burden?

Then France suffered a disaster that transformed political resentment into popular unrest. The harvests of the late 1780s were poor, particularly the harvest of 1788. Severe weather, including hailstorms and an exceptionally harsh winter, damaged agricultural production. Grain became more expensive and bread prices increased dramatically. For ordinary French families, this was catastrophic. Bread was the foundation of the French diet. A substantial increase in its price could consume a huge proportion of a worker’s income, leaving little money for anything else.

An illustration depicting the plight of the French people during the poor harvest

Unemployment also increased as economic difficulties affected industries that depended upon agricultural demand. The wealthy could often survive food shortages more easily because they possessed money, land or stored supplies. The poor could not. Rioting and attacks on food supplies became increasingly common. Bakeries were sometimes looted and accusations that merchants or bakers were deliberately hoarding grain could lead to violence. The crisis transformed dissatisfaction with the monarchy into something far more dangerous. People were no longer merely angry about political privilege. They were hungry.

One of the most famous stories associated with Marie Antoinette emerged from this atmosphere. According to a popular legend, when the Queen was told that the French poor had no bread, she supposedly replied:

Let them eat cake.

An alleged quote from Marie Antoinette

The story is almost certainly false. The phrase appears in Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Confessions, written before Marie Antoinette had even arrived in France, although Rousseau attributed it only to an unnamed “great princess.” There is no reliable evidence that Marie Antoinette ever said it. Nevertheless, the story became extremely useful to revolutionaries. Whether or not the Queen had actually said it was almost irrelevant. The phrase captured the image of Marie Antoinette that revolutionary propaganda wanted the public to believe: an immensely wealthy aristocrat who could not understand the suffering of ordinary people.

A portrait of Rosseau

By 1788, the financial crisis had become impossible for the monarchy to ignore. Louis XVI’s ministers had repeatedly attempted to introduce financial reforms, but privileged groups had resisted measures that would make them pay more taxes. Eventually, the monarchy reached the point where it could no longer borrow enough money to keep the government functioning. Louis therefore agreed to summon the Estates-General, a representative assembly that had not met since 1614. The Third Estate represented the overwhelming majority of the French population, but the traditional voting system meant that each estate effectively received one collective vote. This created an obvious problem. If the First and Second Estates voted together, they could defeat the Third Estate regardless of how many people the Third Estate represented. The Third Estate therefore demanded that voting take place by head, allowing individual representatives to vote rather than giving each estate a single collective vote. The dispute quickly became about something much larger than taxation. It was becoming a struggle over who possessed political authority in France.

The representatives of the Third Estate eventually decided that they could no longer accept the existing system. On June 17th, 1789, they declared themselves the National Assembly, claiming that they represented the French nation rather than merely one section of French society. Members of the clergy and nobility gradually began joining them. Louis XVI attempted to prevent the assembly from meeting by having its usual meeting place closed. When the deputies arrived and discovered that they had been locked out, they moved to a nearby indoor tennis court. There, on June 20th, they made a dramatic pledge. Known as the Tennis Court Oath, the deputies promised not to separate until they had established a constitution for France. The political revolution had begun. The Third Estate was no longer simply asking the King to reform the tax system. It was claiming the right to determine how France itself would be governed.

A painting of the Tennis Court Oath

The National Assembly quickly attracted some of the most influential political thinkers and activists in France. Among them was Maximilien Robespierre, a young lawyer who had become increasingly influenced by Enlightenment ideas and the writings of Rousseau. Another prominent figure was Georges Danton, a powerful speaker who would later become one of the Revolution’s most important leaders. There were also revolutionaries who came from the aristocracy itself. One of the most prominent was the Marquis de Lafayette, who had fought alongside the Americans during their Revolution and had returned to France convinced that constitutional government could be established without destroying the monarchy.

These revolutionaries did not initially agree on what France should become. Some wanted a constitutional monarchy similar to Britain’s. Others wanted a much more democratic republic. Some primarily wanted economic reform and an end to aristocratic privilege. Others increasingly believed that the monarchy itself had to disappear. One of the most important political organisations to emerge from this atmosphere was the Jacobin Club. Originally a debating and political society dominated by reformers, it gradually became associated with increasingly radical revolutionary politics. Robespierre would eventually become its most famous leader. The Revolution was therefore beginning to develop factions within factions.

An illustration of the building where the Jacobin Club met

France had not yet abolished its monarchy. But the authority of the King was already being challenged by a new principle: that political power belonged to the nation rather than simply to the monarch. The financial crisis had created the conditions for revolution. The Enlightenment had provided many of its ideas. And the National Assembly had now given those ideas a political institution through which they could be turned into action. All that remained was for the crisis to become violent.

The Aftermath of the American War of Independence

The Revolution had been fought partly over the principle that governments derived their authority from the people, but the new United States was far from politically settled. The Continental Congress had been deliberately designed to prevent the creation of another powerful central authority, but the resulting government was extremely weak. Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress had difficulty raising taxes, regulating trade or maintaining a strong national military.

An illustration of the Continental Congress

The problems became increasingly obvious after the war. The United States was heavily indebted, states disagreed over trade and taxation, and fears grew that the new republic could collapse into political and economic disorder. In 1787, delegates gathered in Philadelphia to rewrite the country’s system of government. Rather than simply strengthening the Articles of Confederation, they created an entirely new Constitution. It established a federal government divided between three branches: the executive, legislative and judicial.

The presidency was deliberately designed to be powerful enough to govern but constrained by elections, Congress and the courts. There was also an obvious candidate for the first president. George Washington. Washington had become the most respected military figure in the new republic, but he had no desire to become a dictator. In December 1783, he famously resigned his military commission and returned to private life.

With a heart full of love and gratitude, I now take leave of you. I most devoutly wish that your latter days may be as prosperous and happy, as your former ones have been glorious and honourable.

Washington to his officers upon his retirement in 1783
A painting of Washington’s farewell to his officer’s at a tavern

In an age when victorious generals frequently seized political power, Washington’s decision was extraordinary. He had commanded an army for eight years and had the loyalty of thousands of soldiers. Had he chosen to use that popularity to establish himself as a permanent ruler, the new American government might have developed into something entirely different. Instead, Washington voluntarily surrendered his authority.

When the Constitution came into effect in 1789, Washington was unanimously elected as the first President of the United States. He established many of the conventions that would define the office, including appointing a cabinet of advisers and delivering an annual message to Congress. Washington did not attempt to turn the presidency into a monarchy. Nor did he attempt to remain in power indefinitely. After serving two four-year terms, he retired in 1797. His decision established an important precedent: the presidency was an office that a person could willingly leave.

A painting of the inauguration of George Washington

The American victory also had profound consequences outside America. France had played a decisive role in defeating Britain, but supporting the Americans had come at an enormous financial cost. The French government had accumulated huge debts while already struggling with an inefficient taxation system and an increasingly dissatisfied population. The irony was that France had helped create an independent republic partly to weaken its British rival, but the expense of doing so contributed to the financial crisis that eventually helped destabilise the French monarchy.

Within a few years, France itself would experience a revolution. The American Revolution therefore became an important source of inspiration for French revolutionaries. Ideas about popular sovereignty, constitutional government and the rights of citizens crossed the Atlantic. The American example demonstrated that an established monarchy could be challenged and that a new republic could be created in its place. The two revolutions were nevertheless very different. The American Revolution was primarily a war for independence from a foreign government, whereas the French Revolution became a much broader struggle over the structure of French society and government.

A painting of revolutionaries during the French Revolution

The American Revolution permanently changed the political landscape of the Western world. The United States became the first large-scale modern republic created from a successful colonial independence movement, demonstrating that a European imperial power could be defeated by its own subjects. Its declaration that governments derive their legitimacy from the consent of the governed became enormously influential, even though the revolutionary United States did not initially extend those principles to everyone. Slavery remained legal, women were excluded from political participation and Native American peoples faced increasing displacement as the new nation expanded westward. The Revolution was therefore both a radical transformation and an incomplete one.

Nevertheless, its ideas travelled far beyond North America. The language of liberty, constitutional government and popular sovereignty influenced political movements across Europe and the Atlantic world. The French Revolution would soon demonstrate how powerful those ideas could become. The war had begun with a dispute over taxation and political representation. It ended with the creation of a new country and a challenge to one of the fundamental assumptions of eighteenth-century politics: that monarchy and empire were the natural forms of government. The United States had won its independence. Now it had to prove that its experiment in republican government could survive.

The Battle of Yorktown

By 1781, both sides were becoming exhausted by the war. The Continental Army had suffered from shortages of food, clothing and pay, while mutinies had broken out among American troops. Britain, meanwhile, was struggling with the enormous financial cost of fighting a war thousands of miles from home. The French alliance had transformed the conflict, forcing Britain to fight not only the Americans but also France and, increasingly, Spain. Neither side could easily deliver a decisive blow.

An illustration of a mutiny on the Pennsylvania Line in 1781

The British had therefore shifted their attention towards the Southern Colonies, hoping that the large population of Loyalists there would allow them to rebuild their strength. General Charles Cornwallis had campaigned through the Carolinas and eventually moved his army into Virginia. He established himself at Yorktown on the Chesapeake Bay, intending to use the position as a secure base from which British forces could control Virginia and receive supplies and reinforcements by sea.

Unknown to Cornwallis, however, Washington had devised a plan that could trap him. The British commander in New York, General Henry Clinton, had intercepted American communications suggesting that Washington was preparing to attack New York City. Clinton therefore remained in New York, believing the city to be the main target. In reality, Washington was preparing to march his army south towards Virginia. The deception allowed Washington and the French commander, the Comte de Rochambeau, to move thousands of troops away from New York without the British immediately realising what was happening.

The map of the paths of the armies, colliding at Yorktown

At the same time, a French fleet under the Comte de Grasse sailed into the Chesapeake Bay. On September 5th, 1781, the French navy defeated the British fleet at the Battle of the Chesapeake. The victory was crucial. Cornwallis could no longer rely on the Royal Navy to evacuate or reinforce his army. Washington and Rochambeau arrived outside Yorktown and began constructing a series of siege lines around the British position. American and French artillery relentlessly bombarded the town while their soldiers gradually tightened the encirclement. Cornwallis repeatedly requested assistance from Clinton, but British reinforcements never arrived in sufficient numbers.

By October, Cornwallis’s position had become hopeless. His troops were surrounded on land, cut off from the sea and suffering from constant bombardment. On October 19th, 1781, Cornwallis surrendered approximately 8,000 soldiers to the American and French forces. The American Revolution was not technically over. British forces still occupied New York, Charleston and Savannah, and fighting continued elsewhere. However, Yorktown destroyed Britain’s political ability to continue the war. Parliament had lost the will to spend enormous sums of money fighting a conflict that increasingly appeared unwinnable.

A painting of Cornwallis’ surrender at Yorktown

Peace negotiations eventually produced the Treaty of Paris, signed in 1783. Britain formally recognised the independence of the United States of America and agreed to withdraw its forces from the thirteen former colonies. The new United States received territory extending westward to the Mississippi River and northward to the Great Lakes. The Americans, in return, agreed to recognise debts owed to British creditors and promised that Loyalists would not be persecuted or have their property unlawfully confiscated. Britain also retained control of Canada, while Spain recovered Florida from Britain. The treaty formally ended the American Revolutionary War.

For Britain, the result was humiliating. The world’s most powerful empire had been unable to defeat a rebellion in thirteen of its own colonies. Yet Britain itself did not collapse. It remained a major global power and soon began expanding its influence elsewhere. For the United States, however, victory created an entirely new problem. The Americans had won independence. They now had to decide what to do with it.

The Southern Campaign of the American Revolution

By 1780, the American Revolutionary War had entered a frustrating stalemate. British forces still held several important positions, particularly in New York, but their attempts to destroy Washington’s main army had repeatedly failed. The British government therefore began looking for a new strategy. Rather than continuing to fight for territory in the northern colonies, British commanders increasingly turned their attention towards the South. The decision was based on a simple assumption: the Southern colonies contained far more Loyalist support than New England. British commanders believed that large numbers of Americans in Georgia, South Carolina and North Carolina remained loyal to the Crown and would rise up once British forces arrived. If Britain could capture the Southern colonies and raise Loyalist militias, it could gradually isolate the rebellious northern states and restore royal authority.

A painting depicting Britannia, the national personification of Britain, taking in exiled loyalists

The strategy initially appeared to work. In December 1778, British forces captured Savannah, the capital of Georgia. A combined American and French attempt to retake the city in 1779 ended in failure, with the Allies suffering heavy casualties during the unsuccessful Siege of Savannah. The British subsequently strengthened their position in Georgia and expanded their control into the surrounding countryside. The next major target was Charleston, South Carolina. Charleston was one of the most important American ports in the South and the centre of the Southern war effort. In 1780, a large British army under General Henry Clinton surrounded the city. After a prolonged siege, American forces inside Charleston surrendered on May 12th, resulting in the capture of more than 5,000 Continental soldiers. It was one of the largest American defeats of the entire war.

With Charleston captured, the British appeared to have achieved exactly what they had wanted. Much of Georgia and South Carolina fell under British control, while thousands of American soldiers had been taken prisoner. Yet the British soon discovered a serious problem with their strategy. Winning territory was not the same as controlling it. The Southern colonies descended into a brutal civil war between Patriots and Loyalists. Local militias fought one another, ambushed British patrols and attacked supply lines. British commanders could capture towns, but maintaining control over the countryside proved considerably more difficult. Instead of producing a united Loyalist population, British occupation frequently encouraged further resistance.

A paining of American and British forces fighting in the South

The British attempted to exploit the collapse of the Continental Army in the region by recruiting Loyalist militias. One of the most infamous Loyalist victories came at the Battle of Waxhaws in May 1780, where Lieutenant Colonel Banastre Tarleton’s troops defeated a force of American cavalry and infantry. Reports that American soldiers had been killed after attempting to surrender helped create the notorious reputation of “Tarleton’s Quarter.” The violence of the Southern campaign increasingly turned the conflict into a war between neighbours. Communities were divided between those supporting independence and those remaining loyal to Britain, while neither side could be certain who controlled the countryside.

Meanwhile, the American military leadership attempted to rebuild its forces. Congress initially turned to Horatio Gates, the celebrated victor of Saratoga, believing that his previous success made him the obvious choice to command the Southern army. Gates marched into South Carolina with the intention of confronting the British before they could consolidate their gains. His decision proved disastrous. On August 16th, 1780, Gates confronted a British army commanded by General Charles Cornwallis at the Battle of Camden. The American army collapsed almost immediately. Many of the militia troops fled without seriously engaging the British, while the Continental soldiers who remained were overwhelmed. Gates himself was forced to retreat from the battlefield, eventually travelling hundreds of miles away from his shattered army.

An illustration of the Battle of Camden

The defeat effectively destroyed Gates’ reputation as a military commander. The man celebrated for Saratoga had now presided over one of the most humiliating American defeats of the war. George Washington therefore selected a new commander: Nathaniel Greene. Greene understood that the Americans could not defeat Cornwallis by simply confronting the larger British army in a conventional battle. Instead, he adopted a strategy of attrition and manoeuvre. His objective was not necessarily to destroy the British in a single decisive engagement, but to force them to constantly march, fight and consume supplies while American forces remained capable of returning to the battlefield.

Greene famously divided his army, sending part of it under Daniel Morgan into western South Carolina. Cornwallis responded by sending Lieutenant Colonel Banastre Tarleton to destroy Morgan’s force. Instead, Morgan turned the tables. On January 17th, 1781, Morgan defeated Tarleton at the Battle of Cowpens. The American victory inflicted severe casualties on the British and forced Cornwallis to pursue Greene’s army into North Carolina. What followed became known as the Race to the Dan.

A map of Greene’s northern retreat

Greene deliberately retreated northwards, forcing Cornwallis to chase him across increasingly difficult terrain. The British army was constantly forced to march in pursuit of an enemy that repeatedly escaped them. By the time Cornwallis reached the Dan River, Greene had successfully crossed into Virginia and escaped. The retreat had achieved its purpose. Greene had preserved his army while forcing Cornwallis to exhaust his men and supplies. Greene then returned to North Carolina with reinforcements and prepared to confront Cornwallis once again.

On March 15th, 1781, the two armies met at the Battle of Guilford Courthouse. The Americans were eventually forced from the battlefield, giving Cornwallis a tactical victory. But it was a devastating one. British casualties were so severe that Cornwallis could no longer afford to pursue Greene’s army into the countryside. The Americans had lost the battle, but strategically, Greene had achieved much of what he wanted. Cornwallis had been forced to fight his way through North Carolina while suffering heavy casualties and struggling to maintain his supply lines. Greene’s army, meanwhile, remained intact.

A painting of the Battle of Guilford Courthouse

The Southern Campaign therefore demonstrated one of the central problems facing the British war effort. Britain could still win individual battles and capture major cities, but it was becoming increasingly difficult to translate those victories into lasting control. The Americans did not need to destroy the British army outright. They simply needed to survive longer than Britain was willing to continue fighting.

Greene continued campaigning throughout the Carolinas, gradually forcing British forces to abandon much of the territory they had captured. Cornwallis eventually decided to move his army north into Virginia, where he hoped to establish a new British base and coordinate with reinforcements. Instead, he would find himself marching towards the decisive confrontation of the entire war.

An illustration of Cornwallis with some of his men

The British Southern strategy had begun with the capture of Savannah and Charleston and the belief that Loyalist support would restore the colonies to the Crown. By 1781, however, the countryside was consumed by partisan warfare, British supply lines were overstretched and American armies remained in the field. The war in the South had not been won by the Americans through one spectacular victory. Instead, Greene and his commanders had gradually worn down the British position, demonstrating that an army capable of winning battles could still lose a war.

The Betrayal of Benedict Arnold

By 1779, Benedict Arnold had become one of the most controversial figures in the American Revolution. He had once been celebrated as one of the Continental Army’s most courageous commanders, but a combination of personal resentment, financial difficulties and political disputes had gradually turned him against the revolutionary cause. His eventual betrayal would make his name synonymous with treason in American history. Arnold’s frustration had been building for several years. Despite playing an important role in the American victories at Saratoga, he believed that Congress had repeatedly denied him the recognition he deserved. Other officers had been promoted above him, while Arnold was also accused of using his position to make money from military contracts and supplies. He was eventually court-martialled over allegations of corruption and misuse of military authority.

A portrait of Benedict Arnold

The court-martial largely cleared him of the most serious accusations, but Washington reprimanded him for using his position for personal benefit. Arnold felt humiliated. He had sacrificed a great deal for the Revolution, including suffering a serious leg wound at Saratoga, yet increasingly believed that Congress and his fellow revolutionaries were treating him with contempt.

His personal life also began to change. In 1778, American forces retook Philadelphia after the British evacuated the city. Arnold was appointed military commander of Philadelphia, where he began associating with the city’s wealthy social elite. He moved into the former home of the Penn family, which had been used by British commander William Howe during the occupation, and began living an expensive lifestyle that was far beyond what his military income could comfortably support. Arnold also became romantically involved with Peggy Shippen, a young woman from a wealthy Philadelphia family. The Shippen family had maintained connections with British officers during the occupation, and Peggy herself had previously been associated with British Major John André. Arnold and Peggy married in April 1779.

An illustration of Peggy Shippen and her child

Arnold’s increasingly extravagant lifestyle attracted suspicion. Pennsylvania authorities accused him of corruption and misuse of his military position, and he was eventually subjected to a court-martial. Although he was convicted on several relatively minor charges, Washington gave him only a mild reprimand. The decision reflected Washington’s continued belief that Arnold was fundamentally a brave and valuable soldier. Washington famously described him as a “fighting general” and had previously trusted him with some of the Continental Army’s most important operations.

But Arnold had reached a breaking point. Rather than simply resigning from the Continental Army, he began secretly communicating with the British. Peggy Shippen played an important role in facilitating communications between Arnold and British intelligence. Arnold eventually established contact with Major John André, who had become the British chief of intelligence in New York. Arnold offered the British something potentially devastating: West Point.

A painting of Fort West Point

West Point was one of the most strategically important American positions on the Hudson River. Its location allowed the Continental Army to control a crucial section of the river and prevent Britain from separating New England from the rest of the United States. If the British could capture it, they could potentially divide the American forces and seriously damage the revolutionary war effort. Arnold therefore requested command of West Point. Washington agreed.

In August 1780, Arnold took command of the fortress and its surrounding defences. He then secretly provided André with information about the fort’s weaknesses, troop numbers, artillery positions and supplies. In exchange, Arnold expected a large payment and a senior position in the British Army. The plan began to unravel in September. André travelled into American territory under the alias “John Anderson” to meet Arnold and collect the military documents. He was attempting to return to British lines when three American militiamen stopped him near Tarrytown, New York. They searched him and discovered the documents hidden inside his clothing. André was immediately arrested.

An illustration of the arrest of André

Arnold quickly realised that his conspiracy had been exposed. He escaped down the Hudson River aboard the British ship Vulture and reached British-held New York. Washington arrived at West Point shortly afterwards and discovered the extent of Arnold’s betrayal. André was tried as a spy and sentenced to death. Washington privately admired André’s conduct and attempted to arrange a prisoner exchange, but the British refused. André was hanged on October 2nd, 1780. Arnold, meanwhile, received what he had wanted. The British commissioned him as a brigadier general and paid him for the information he had provided. He subsequently commanded British forces against the Americans, including campaigns in Virginia and Connecticut. He led raids against American towns and military positions, fighting against the same revolutionaries alongside whom he had once served. His military career on the British side, however, never reached the heights he had expected. He was distrusted by many British officers, while his former comrades regarded him as one of the Revolution’s greatest traitors.

Benedict Arnold’s story is unusual because his reputation did not begin with betrayal. Before defecting, he had been one of the Continental Army’s most aggressive and capable commanders. He played important roles in the capture of Fort Ticonderoga, the invasion of Canada and, most famously, the Battles of Saratoga. His leadership at Saratoga helped produce one of the most important American victories of the war and contributed directly to France entering the conflict. His betrayal therefore cannot simply be explained by a lifelong commitment to the British cause. Arnold was a revolutionary who became deeply resentful of the political establishment he believed had mistreated him. His grievances were real, but his response to them ultimately transformed him from an American hero into a symbol of treason.

An illustration of Arnold commanding the burning of New London, Connecticut, as a British Commander

The irony is that Arnold’s name became more famous because of his betrayal than because of his victories. His earlier achievements have often been overshadowed by the simple phrase that has followed him for centuries: “Benedict Arnold” became synonymous with traitor. Yet there is another irony. Arnold himself did not necessarily view his actions as betraying a country that he believed already existed. The United States was still fighting for independence, and Arnold had become convinced that the revolutionary leadership had betrayed the principles for which he had originally fought. His decision was therefore partly personal, partly political and partly financial.

Whatever his motivations, the consequences were undeniable. The man who had once helped save the American Revolution eventually attempted to undermine it from within. And while the Revolution ultimately succeeded without him, Benedict Arnold would spend the rest of his life knowing that the greatest achievement of his military career was the same war he ultimately tried to betray.

The French Entry Into the American Revolution

The American victory at Trenton and Princeton had prevented the Continental Army from collapsing, but Britain still possessed enormous military advantages. The British army controlled New York, had captured Newport in Rhode Island and was preparing to crush the rebellion in the southern colonies. Washington’s army therefore spent much of the winter of 1777 in Morristown, New Jersey, attempting to recover from the previous year’s disastrous campaign.

An illustration of the encampment at Morristown

The British attempted to regain the initiative in New Jersey, but Washington’s army proved much harder to destroy than expected. British forces were repeatedly harassed by American troops and militia, while Washington avoided committing his entire army to a battle that could result in its destruction. By the spring, the British had largely withdrawn from southern New Jersey and concentrated their forces elsewhere.

Britain’s attention now turned towards a potentially decisive strategy: separating New England from the rest of the American colonies. The Hudson River provided a natural route for doing so. If British forces could advance south from Canada while another army moved north from New York, they could meet somewhere along the Hudson Valley and effectively cut the rebellion in half. The northern part of this operation was entrusted to General John Burgoyne. His army advanced south from Canada in the summer of 1777, capturing Fort Ticonderoga before continuing towards the Hudson Valley. Meanwhile, General William Howe was supposed to move north from New York and meet Burgoyne.

A portrait of General Burgoyne

Instead, Howe made a crucial decision that would change the course of the war. Rather than marching north, he decided to attack Philadelphia, the political capital of the revolution. After defeating Washington at the Battle of Brandywine, British forces occupied Philadelphia in September 1777, forcing the Continental Congress to flee to York, Pennsylvania. Militarily, Howe had achieved an impressive victory. Politically, however, Philadelphia was less important than the British expected. Congress simply relocated, while Washington’s army remained in the field. More importantly, Howe’s decision meant that Burgoyne was now advancing through hostile territory without the support he had been promised.

Burgoyne’s army increasingly struggled with American resistance and a lack of supplies. American militia flooded into the region, while General Horatio Gates assembled a growing Continental force to block the British advance. The resulting confrontation centred on Saratoga, New York. Benedict Arnold once again played a crucial role. Arnold had become increasingly frustrated with Congress and his fellow officers, believing that his contributions were being overlooked while other generals received promotions and credit. At Saratoga, he clashed with Gates over how the American army should respond to the British advance.

A map of the area from the period

Gates preferred to maintain a defensive position and allow the British to attack the American fortifications. Arnold believed the Americans should take the initiative and strike Burgoyne before he could reorganise. Although Gates opposed an aggressive attack, Arnold eventually led troops into battle during the fighting at Bemis Heights. The American assault inflicted heavy casualties on Burgoyne’s army, and Arnold himself was seriously wounded after leading a charge against the British position. The Americans won the Battle of Saratoga on October 17th, 1777. Burgoyne was surrounded, cut off from reinforcements and supplies, and ultimately forced to surrender his entire army. The victory was a turning point. For the British, Saratoga demonstrated that the rebellion could not simply be crushed by military force. For the Americans, it provided desperately needed evidence that independence was achievable. But its greatest consequences were diplomatic.

Benjamin Franklin had been sent to France to persuade King Louis XVI’s government to support the American cause. France had several reasons to oppose Britain. The two countries had been bitter rivals for generations, and France had lost much of its North American empire to Britain during the Seven Years’ War. Supporting the Americans offered France an opportunity to weaken its greatest rival and potentially recover some of the influence it had lost. Franklin proved to be an exceptionally effective diplomat. He cultivated influential figures at the French court and presented the American Revolution as a legitimate struggle against British tyranny. His personal popularity in Paris also helped him build support for the American cause. He became something of a celebrity in French society, although his diplomatic activities were considerably more important to the revolution than his famously active social and romantic life.

A painting of Franklin in the Parisian Court

The French government had already been secretly supplying the Americans with weapons, ammunition and other military supplies. However, openly entering the war against Britain was a much more dangerous decision. Saratoga changed the calculation. The American victory demonstrated that the Continental Army could defeat a major British force. France now had reason to believe that the United States might actually survive. In February 1778, France formally recognised American independence and signed the Treaty of Amity and Commerce and the Treaty of Alliance with the United States. The consequences were enormous.

Britain was no longer fighting a rebellion confined to its thirteen colonies. It was now fighting France as well, and eventually Spain and the Dutch Republic would also become involved in the wider conflict. The British were forced to divert troops, ships and resources away from North America to defend their possessions and interests around the world. Burgoyne’s surrender therefore achieved something that Washington had been unable to accomplish through battlefield victories alone: it transformed the American Revolution into an international war. The British abandoned Philadelphia in the summer of 1778 as the new French threat forced them to concentrate their forces around New York. Washington followed them across New Jersey, eventually fighting the British at the Battle of Monmouth. The battle was largely inconclusive, but the Continental Army demonstrated how much it had improved since the disasters of 1776.

A painting of the Battle of Monmouth

Much of that improvement had taken place during the winter at Valley Forge. Washington’s army endured freezing temperatures, hunger and disease, but it also received an extraordinary contribution from a Prussian military officer, Friedrich Wilhelm von Steuben. Arriving at Valley Forge in 1778, Steuben introduced a systematic programme of training, teaching soldiers how to march, manoeuvre, maintain formations and handle their weapons effectively. He imposed strict discipline and helped turn the Continental Army from a collection of inexperienced militia and volunteers into a more professional fighting force.

By the time spring arrived, Washington’s army was considerably better trained and disciplined than the force that had been driven out of New York two years earlier. The war had entered a new phase. Washington had survived the disasters of 1776, Saratoga had brought France into the conflict, and the Continental Army was becoming a genuine professional fighting force. Britain still controlled major cities and possessed enormous resources, but the rebellion was no longer an isolated colonial uprising. It had become a global war – and Britain’s chances of crushing American independence were rapidly disappearing.

The Crossing of the Delaware

By December 1776, the American Revolution appeared to be on the verge of collapse. Washington’s Continental Army had suffered a series of devastating defeats around New York and had been driven across New Jersey into Pennsylvania. Thousands of soldiers had been killed, wounded or captured, while many more had simply deserted. The enlistments of many remaining soldiers were also due to expire at the end of the year. If Washington could not achieve a victory soon, his army might effectively disappear.

Washington on the opposite bank of the Delaware from the British Army

The British, meanwhile, believed that the American rebellion was nearing its end. British and Hessian (German speaking auxiliary) forces had occupied much of New Jersey, establishing a series of scattered garrisons throughout the region. One of the most important was at Trenton, where around 1,400 Hessian soldiers were stationed under Colonel Johann Rall. The Hessians were German troops hired by Britain to fight alongside its army. Although they were experienced soldiers, they were spread across a number of defensive positions and had become increasingly confident that the Americans were incapable of mounting another major attack. Washington desperately needed to prove them wrong.

With Christmas approaching, Washington devised an extremely risky plan. He would cross the Delaware River during the night, attack the Hessian garrison at Trenton and then withdraw before the British could bring their larger forces against him. The operation depended upon secrecy and timing. If the army were detected while crossing the river, Washington’s already weakened force could potentially be destroyed. On the evening of December 25th, 1776, Washington’s soldiers began gathering along the Pennsylvania side of the Delaware. The conditions were terrible. The river was filled with floating ice, while strong winds and freezing temperatures made the crossing extremely dangerous. The original plan involved several separate crossings, but worsening conditions prevented some of them from taking place. Nevertheless, Washington continued with the operation.

A painting of Washington crossing the Delaware with his men

The importance of getting his entire force across the river was so great that Washington reportedly ordered everyone to carry weapons, including musicians and other non-combat personnel. The soldiers struggled to move artillery and supplies across the icy water while maintaining silence and discipline. The crossing took far longer than expected. Washington’s army did not finish crossing until the early hours of December 26th. Despite the difficulties, the operation had succeeded: the Hessians at Trenton had not been warned that an American attack was coming. Washington now marched his exhausted soldiers towards the town.

At approximately 8 a.m. on December 26th, the Continental Army attacked Trenton from several directions. The Hessians were caught by surprise and attempted to organise a defence, but the Americans quickly seized key positions and brought artillery into the town. Colonel Rall attempted to rally his men and launch a counterattack, but he was mortally wounded during the fighting. Within roughly an hour, the Hessian resistance collapsed. Around 900 Hessian soldiers were captured, while only a small number of Americans were killed or wounded. Washington had achieved something that had seemed almost impossible only days earlier: a major American victory.

A painting of the Battle of Trenton

The victory at Trenton was militarily modest compared with the enormous battles that had already taken place around New York. Its psychological importance, however, was enormous. The Continental Army had demonstrated that it could still defeat experienced British troops and their allies. More importantly, soldiers who had been considering desertion were given a reason to remain in the army. Washington did not stop there. After crossing back into Pennsylvania, he returned to New Jersey and established a position around Trenton. When British commander Lord Cornwallis moved against him with a much larger force, Washington managed to evade the British during the night and march around their army. He then attacked the British garrison at Princeton on January 3rd, 1777, winning another important victory.

The victories at Trenton and Princeton did not end the American Revolution, but they transformed its momentum. The British still controlled New York and possessed vastly superior military resources, while the Continental Army remained poorly equipped. Yet Washington had shown that the rebellion could survive. The crossing of the Delaware therefore became more than a daring military operation. It was the moment when the American Revolution, which had seemed close to defeat, was given a new lease of life. Washington had kept his army alive – and, in doing so, kept the revolution alive with it.

The British Counter Offensive of 1776

The Declaration of Independence transformed the conflict from a rebellion into an outright war for national independence. King George III and the British government now had little reason to believe that the colonies could be brought back into the Empire through negotiation. The rebellion had to be defeated militarily. Britain therefore assembled a massive expeditionary force to crush the Continental Army and capture the political centre of the revolution.

Frederick North, Lord North, the UK Prime Minister during the revolution

In the summer of 1776, a British fleet carrying around 30,000 troops arrived off New York. Commanded by General William Howe and supported by his brother, Admiral Richard Howe, the British intended to seize New York City and destroy Washington’s army. New York was strategically important because the Hudson River provided a route into the interior of the colonies, while its excellent harbour could serve as a major British naval base.

The British established their main camp on Staten Island, while Washington positioned his army across Long Island and around Brooklyn Heights. The Americans constructed defensive positions and expected the British to attack. Washington, however, was facing a serious problem: his army was still inexperienced, poorly supplied and composed largely of short-term volunteers. The British, by contrast, possessed one of the world’s most experienced professional armies and the most powerful navy in the world.

An illustration of a typical British encampment, similar to the one on Staten Island

Rather than immediately launch a frontal assault, General Howe spent several weeks gathering his forces and looking for weaknesses in the American defences. On August 22nd, British troops began landing on Long Island. Five days later, the Battle of Long Island began. The British used a strategy designed to exploit the American position. While part of Howe’s army attacked the Continental forces from the front, another force secretly moved around their flank through lightly defended routes. The Americans were eventually overwhelmed and forced back towards their fortifications around Brooklyn Heights. Washington’s army suffered heavy casualties and thousands of soldiers were captured.

The situation quickly became desperate. The Continental Army was trapped between the British army and the East River, with New York City behind them and little room to retreat. Washington reportedly watched the battle from Brooklyn Heights as his army was pushed towards the river. If the British attacked the American fortifications directly and succeeded, the entire Continental Army could potentially be destroyed. Yet Howe hesitated. Rather than immediately assault the heavily defended American positions, the British began preparing to besiege them. This decision gave Washington an opportunity that might otherwise never have existed.

A painting of the Continental Army on Long Island

During the night of August 29th and into the early hours of August 30th, American troops quietly withdrew from Long Island across the East River. A combination of darkness, favourable weather and a thick fog concealed the evacuation from the British. Soldiers, artillery and supplies were gradually transported across the river to Manhattan. By morning, almost the entire American army had escaped. The retreat was one of the most important moments of the entire campaign. The British had won a decisive victory, but they had failed to destroy Washington’s army. Had the Continental Army been captured at Brooklyn, the rebellion might have collapsed before the newly declared United States had even established itself.

Instead, the British continued their advance. Washington was forced to abandon New York City and retreat north before eventually withdrawing through New Jersey. The Continental Army suffered further defeats at Kips Bay, White Plains and Fort Washington. By December, Washington had been pushed across the Delaware River into Pennsylvania. Morale within the American army collapsed. Soldiers deserted, supplies became scarce and Washington’s leadership was increasingly questioned. The British appeared to be winning almost everywhere they went. To many Americans, the war seemed all but lost. Yet the British victory contained a crucial weakness. They had repeatedly defeated Washington’s army, but they had failed to destroy it. Washington understood that his primary objective was no longer to win every battle, but to keep the Continental Army alive. As long as an American army remained in the field, Britain could not claim that the rebellion had been completely defeated.

Washington on the other side of the Delaware River from the British Army

By the end of 1776, Washington had been driven hundreds of miles from New York, suffered several humiliating defeats and lost much of his army. But he had survived. The British had captured territory, but they had not captured the revolution. And Washington was about to attempt one of the most audacious counterattacks of the entire war.

The Siege of Boston

While the British Army remained trapped in Boston, the newly formed Continental Army desperately needed weapons and ammunition. Most of the colonial militia had arrived with whatever firearms they already owned, leaving Washington with an army that was large enough to surround Boston but poorly equipped for a prolonged war. An opportunity to solve this problem appeared hundreds of miles to the north at Fort Ticonderoga, a British fortification overlooking the strategically important route between Lake Champlain and Lake George.

A modern day image of Fort Ticonderoga

One of the men who recognised the opportunity was Benedict Arnold, a talented but increasingly controversial Connecticut militia officer. Arnold proposed capturing the fort and seizing its large stores of artillery and ammunition before the British could reinforce it. He began marching towards Ticonderoga, hoping to gather militia along the way. However, he soon discovered that another group had already formed the same plan. Ethan Allen, leader of the Green Mountain Boys of Vermont, was marching towards the fort with his own force.

The two men immediately argued over who should command the expedition. Allen eventually took overall command, while Arnold remained involved in the operation. In the early hours of May 10th, 1775, the Americans crossed Lake Champlain and entered Fort Ticonderoga while most of its small British garrison was still asleep. The defenders were caught almost completely by surprise and surrendered after only token resistance. The Americans had captured the fort and, more importantly, its stockpile of British weapons and ammunition.

An illustration of Allen demanding the Fort’s surrender

The victory was strategically important, but it also created an early rivalry between Arnold and Allen. Allen became celebrated as the hero of the capture, while Arnold felt that his own contribution had been deliberately ignored. Their dispute would become an early indication of the difficult relationships and political rivalries that would later plague the Continental Army.

The Americans soon attempted to use their position at Ticonderoga to expand the war into Canada. American forces captured Montreal but were eventually defeated at Quebec and forced to retreat southwards. Although the Canadian campaign had failed, the Americans still controlled Ticonderoga and had gained access to a valuable collection of British artillery. Washington now needed to get those guns to Boston.

An illustration of the guns captured at Ticonderoga

The man given the task was Henry Knox, a young bookseller from Boston who had taught himself military engineering. Knox proposed transporting the captured artillery more than 300 miles from Ticonderoga to the American army outside Boston. During the winter of 1775–76, Knox and his men dragged dozens of heavy cannons through the frozen wilderness using sledges pulled by horses and oxen. The journey was extraordinarily difficult, but by January the artillery had reached the outskirts of Boston. Washington now possessed something he had desperately lacked: heavy guns capable of threatening the British position.

The British commander, General William Howe, had also recognised the importance of the high ground surrounding Boston. His army occupied Boston itself while the Americans controlled the surrounding countryside. Washington believed that an assault might be necessary to end the siege, but his officers warned him that attacking the heavily fortified British positions directly could result in enormous casualties. Instead, they proposed using the newly arrived artillery to force the British out. The opportunity came in March 1776. American troops secretly occupied Dorchester Heights, a series of hills overlooking Boston and its harbour. During the night, they constructed fortifications and positioned Knox’s artillery at the top of the heights. When morning came, the British were confronted with an unexpected problem. American cannons now commanded both the city and the harbour, while British ships were vulnerable to fire from above.

An illustration of the American forces on Dorchester Heights

Howe realised that attacking the heights would be extremely costly. Remaining in Boston was equally dangerous, as the Americans could now bombard the city and threaten the British fleet. With no realistic way to hold the position, Howe ordered the evacuation of Boston. Beginning on March 17th, 1776, approximately 11,000 British troops, along with thousands of Loyalist civilians, evacuated the city aboard a fleet of ships. They sailed for Halifax, Nova Scotia, leaving Boston entirely in American hands.

For Washington, it was his first major victory as commander of the Continental Army. The British had occupied Boston for years, but in less than a year of open warfare they had been forced to abandon it. More importantly, the victory demonstrated the growing effectiveness of the Continental Army. The weapons captured at Ticonderoga had been transported across hundreds of miles of frozen wilderness and used to force one of the world’s most powerful armies from an important colonial city. Yet the victory also revealed the changing nature of the war. The British had not been defeated; they had simply withdrawn. Their main army would soon return with overwhelming reinforcements, and the next British target would be New York. The Siege of Boston had ended, but the American War of Independence was only beginning.